In development
Pull the facts out of award documents
Award numbers, periods, amounts and terms, proposed from notices of award and funding notices, each linked to its line in the source.
Use case · Research administration
One workspace for the documents behind every award.
Grant applications, notices of award and inter-institution agreements: read once, checked by a person, and searchable with the source of every answer.
In developmentDoc Intel for grant recordsIn designSubawards for agreements
Notice of award · extracted fieldsSample data
- Award number
- 5R01XX000000-03
- p.1 §I
- Project period
- 2024-07-01 → 2029-06-30
- p.1 §I
- Budget period
- 2026-07-01 → 2027-06-30
- p.1 §I
- Amount this action
- $412,880
- p.2 §III
- Carryover
- Prior approval required
- To review · 0.57
For grant records
Less re-keying, and answers you can defend.
In development
Ask across your records
“Which of our awards need prior approval for carryover?” The answer cites each notice it relied on, so you can check it before you act.
In development
A person confirms what matters
Low-confidence values go to a review queue. Your staff accept, correct or reject them, and each decision is kept.
For agreements
In designSubawards on the FDP templates.
Subawards populates the agreement from the award and the department’s intake form, shows the source of every field, checks locked template text exactly, and keeps internal notes out of anything sent to the other institution.
Explore Subawards- 01Outgoing subawardIntake → signature
- 02Incoming subawardEvery departure highlighted
- 03Unilateral modificationAcknowledged by click
Access and audit
Built for what a research office must protect.
Sponsor-confidential terms, personnel details and draft budgets don’t belong in everyone’s search results. Access is set per repository and per document, and search respects it.
- In developmentPer-document access. A department sees its own awards; central staff see what their role allows.
- In developmentTiers you name. Your office defines its own clearance levels and labels.
- In designA record of who saw what. Viewing and sensitive actions go to a tamper-evident audit trail.
- PrincipleStrictest rules first. We design as if the strictest rules that could apply do: HIPAA, CUI handling, GDPR, FERPA and research-specific rules. This is how we build, not a certification.
For research offices
Tell us how your office handles awards today.
A short conversation about the documents you work with. No product demo pitch.